Skip to main content

Energy comparison: nuclear fission

Welcome back to Green World

Today we're talking about nuclear fission. This energy source is quite controverial, so we're going to be looking at why.

Before we begin, just a quick side note, there are multiple forms of nuclear power. This post is about nuclear fission. Nuclear decay is rarely used, most notably in some space missions. Nuclear fusion is currently being researched by scientists around the world and isn't used for commercial electricity yet.

First, let's explain how nuclear fission actually works. This involves a lot of complicated chemistry and physics, but I'll do my best to explain it. Before anything else we need to look at what is in an atom.
In this image, the grey represents negatively charged electrons, which circle the nucleus (plural: nuclei) in the center. The nucleus (blue and red) is made up of positively chargerd protons and neutrons (which are neutral). This means that the nucleus is positive. The protons and neutrons are held together by nuclear force. Therefore, the nucleus contains a lot of energy. Nuclear fission is the process of breaking the nucleus up and releasing that energy.

So now that we've got the basic vocabulary covered, we can move on to the actual process of fission. First a neutron is shot towards a nucleus at a great speed. The energy in the neutron and the speed that it's moving deforms the nucleus into a doubled lobed shaped (a bit like a peanut). The gap between the two lobes grows bigger until it's too big for the nuclear force to hold the protons and neutrons together. The nucleus breaks into smaller fragments, consisting of only a couple protons and neutrons each. Two, sometimes three, neutrons break apart and aren't connected to any protons at all. The positively charged fragments (due to the protons) repel each other, which causes the single neutrons to fly off at high speeds. These neutrons then hit the nuclei from nearby atoms and restart the whole process. The energy released when the neucleus breaks apart is what we then turn into electricity.

The most commonly stated problem with nuclear fission is the storage and disposal of by-products. Nuclear waste is split into three categories based on the level of radiation: low, intermediate and high. 90% of all fission waste falls has a low radioactive level. 3% of fission waste has a high radioactive level. These 3% release 95% of total the radioactivity from nulcear fission plants. However Harvard University states on its website, that ".. coal power plants release more radioactive material per kWh into the environment in the form of coals ash than does waste from a nuclear power plant under standard shielding protocols." The fatality rates per kWh are higher in fossil feuls than in nuclear power. This is also due to the dangers of coal mining which we covered here. There are no CO2 emissions in nuclear power after the power plants have been constructed, meaning that nuclear power only produces 16kg of CO2 for every kWh of electricity that is produced, compared to the 820kg CO2 per kWh released by coal plants.The radioactivity of nuclear waste is reduced to 0.1% after about 50 years.

Another big problem are the nuclear disasters. Inside a nuclear power plant, there are all sorts of protective messures such as coolers, etc. Nuclear disasters occur when something go wrong and it leads to vast amounts of electromagnetic radiation which has 100 000 times more energy than visible light! Nuclear disasters often occur after natural disasters such as tsunamis or earthquakes as these can shut down the protective messures. There is a cancer risk connected to these disasters. 5 000 thyroid cancer cases have been connected to the Chernobyl accident in 1986 in Ukraine which left a large inhabitable zone and caused thousands to evactuate their homes.


We hoped you found this post interesting. It's a very complex discussion and there are some many more points than we mentioned here. See you next week!
Your Green World Blog Team💚

Images:
Atom structure: This image was published on pixabay.com by geralt.

Sources:

Comments