Skip to main content

Energy comparison: solar (PV) panels

Hi everyone,

Today I'm looking into the first on a long list of energy sources: solar (PV) panels. Are they actually sustainable and could they become our main energy source in the near future? After all, enough energy from the sun reaches the earth in 90 minutes to cover the entire world's energy consumption for a whole year!

How they work

There are a couple of ways to transform energy from the sun into electricity. The one we are looking at today is solar panels also known as solar photovoltaic technology. Photovoltaic (PV) technology is the key to solar panels. A solar panel is made of many PV cells. A single PV cell will produce 1-2 watts of power. They are very thin and are normally protected by glass and/or plastics. This is the best explanation I could find (click here for the source):
When the semiconductor is exposed to light, it absorbs the light’s energy and transfers it to negatively charged particles in the material called electrons. This extra energy allows the electrons to flow through the material as an electrical current.
The electric current produced is a direct current, so a converter is added to convert it into an alternating current used in households. Some PV systems will have structures that angle the panels to face the sun for maximal energy production.

Energy storage

Solar panels themselves do not store energy. However, there are batteries for storing solar energy. They are quite expensive. Lithium-ion batteries are at least 90% efficient. That isn't terrible but you would still lose 10% of your electricity. Lead-acid batteries may be the most affordable, but they have an efficiency of 60%-80% (depending on model and brand). That's quite bad. Flow batteries, which are the newest model have 85% efficiency. So all in all, solar batteries aren't amazing and it's definitely one of the biggest problems for the industry.

Energy in production

To produce one 100-watt solar panel, you need about 200kWh (varying massively). With enough sunlight, the 100-watt solar panel would produce enough electricity to cover that in about 2 years. A solar array (multiple solar panels) has a carbon footprint about 20 times smaller than a power plant (when both produce the same amount of energy). A solar panel becomes net zero after about 4 years of being used. We're hoping that it will soon be possible to use solar panels to power the factory making solar panels. However, there would still be CO2 emissions due to transportation and maintenance.

Downsides

In 2016, 250 000 tonnes of 'solar panel waste' were generated in the whole world. Estimates say it could be 78 million tonnes in 2050. Cadmium and lead are contained in this waste and can be washed into local rivers and bodies of water, causing extreme health risks for nearby people.
As mentioned above, fossil fuels, normally coal, are needed to produce solar panels. During production, hydrofluoric acid and sodium hydroxide are used. Most of this is dumped in local bodies of water, where they release toxic substances and chemical waste. There are also allegations of a lack of the needed safety gear and regulations that protect the workers producing the solar panels.
19 different rare metals are needed for PV cells, and most of them require mining. So we cannot create endless solar panels without running out of materials.

Covering the Sahara?

Many people think we should cover the Sahara desert with solar panels. This may sound like a good idea at first. After all, it would produce enough electricity to easily power the whole world, there is plenty and as not many species live in the desert, it wouldn't destroy too much habitat. However, it is a very bad idea.
  1. We have already mentioned the fact that we do not have the needed resources to produce that many solar panels.
  2. We do not have the infrastructure to build a massive solar field.
  3. Such a project would produce massive greenhouse gas emissions during production.
  4. As already mentioned, we can't effienciety store solar energy and transporting it to another part of the world would be difficult.
  5. We would have to replace the solar panels after about 25 years, which would cause massive amounts of waste.
  6. It would cost trillions of dollars.
  7. While it is night in the Sahara, there will be no electricity production. However at this time, it is broad daylight in Australia meaning that they need electricity. As said before, the storage is not optimal.
  8. A power cable from the sahara to the rest of the world would have at least a 20% power loss.
  9. The solar panels would cool the desert, meaning plants would grow. Then it wouldn't be a desert anymore and we would be destroying more habitat.
  10. The dust and sand that the wind in the sahara picks up, fertilises the Amazon rainforest. With all those solar panels in the way, the dust wouldn't fertilise the Amazon. The amazon dying would be a catastrophy.
  11. Due to point 9. hurricanes and storms would rampage the Americas more frequently.
  12. Global oxygen levels may drop due to losing the amazon (point 10.) and the atlantic also being affected.
I could go on and on, but I think you get the point. Covering the entire Sahara and trying to power the whole world with it, is a really bad idea. However, it could be implemented on a much smaller scale to provide local populations with electricity. Morroco has the world's largest solar farm in the Sahara.



All in all, solar panels aren't great for the environment. However, the idea of using the sun's energy is actually not too bad. If the technology surrounding the production, waste and storage of solar panels could be drastically improved, then we could use solar panels as the world's main power source. We just need the technology to be efficient first. This is already in the making, hundreds of scientists world-wide are working on how to improve solar panels. There are also ideas of creating solar farms in space, which would eliminate the problem of solar farms being reliant on the weather.

Your Green World Blog TeamšŸ’š


Sources:

Image: 
This image, owned by Wolfram Burner (on flickr.com) is liscensed under CC BY-NC 2.0.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Deforestation and why it’s a problem

Hi everyone, Welcome back to another post. Today we’ll be talking about deforestation and its impacts on our earth. Deforestation, the widespread clearance of natural forests, has been happening for thousands of years. One example is Western Europe, where, two millennia ago, 80% of the land was cloaked in dense forest cover. However, over time, a significant portion of this green expanse was sacrificed to create room for crops, livestock grazing, and as a source of fuel and building materials. Presently, a mere 34% of Western Europe retains its woodland. Today, the tropics deal with the brunt of deforestation. Activities such as mining, agriculture, road construction, and the establishment of vast cattle ranches drive the mass clearance of tropical rainforests. This results in the release of huge amounts of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, exacerbating the global climate crisis. The consequences come in two waves: first, the reduced number of...

Evolution

Hi, So today, I am going to talk about evolution. We have mentioned this before in our Galapagos Ecosystem series but we’ve never gone over exactly what it is. So before Charles Darwin thought of his theory of evolution, the majority of people in Europe thought that all species were unrelated and that humans were not related to animals. This was mostly based on Christianity. Darwin studied hundreds of different species and on the GalĆ”pagos Islands , he first started to form his theory of evolution. Darwin's theory of evolution by natural selection, as it was later called, is best explained by the example of the giraffe. Let's assume that giraffes have short necks (as they did many centuries ago). Now a mother has two children. By chance, one has a slightly longer neck. This is a coincidence. As the giraffes feed on the lower leaves of the trees, these slower disappear. There aren't enough leaves for the giraffes. Thus the giraffe wi...

Climate change: what is it and what's the problem

Hello, I've noticed that we are always mentioning climate change. Not only us blog editors but also politicians, activists and so on. The words climate change are bounced around in the media and probably in your households, but do you actually know what it is or how it works? I know that for a long time, I didn't know what it really meant. I hope that this post changes that. What is climate change and how does it work? The words climate change describe a slow shift in the earth's temperature and changes in the weather patterns. Having a single warm winter does not instantly mean climate change. Climate change happens over a long period of time. If you look at a temperature graph over the years, it doesn't go up in one day and then stay the same for another hundred years. It curves up slowly but steadily. This is a average temperature graph from 1880 to just after 2000. You can see how the temperature gradually gets warmer....

The Responsible Traveller by Karen Edwards || a practical guide to reducing your environmental and social impact // BOOK REVIEW

HI Everyone! Our January monthly post was a zero-waste challenge, but as we explained in our  2023 wrap up , this year we will be alternating a monthly challenge with a book review, of course related to the environment. This week, I'm going to share a recommendation for a fantastic book, all about how you can travel more sustainably and responsibly. I absolutely love travelling, but I'm also very aware of the impact it has on the world, and I am very keen to learn more about how I can further reduce my impact. That's why I bought this book around a year ago, and I've really enjoyed reading it and learning from it.  This is a practical, small-format guide, sharing both basic information about the climate crisis and the impact of various travel activities, and how you can do your bit. It shares specific journeys that are more environmentally friendly options, for example long distance train journeys such as The Alaskan Railroad with its stunning alpine forests and wide ar...

April Top Tips: ten tips for environmentally friendly travel

Hi Everyone! We haven't been very present on the blog again recently but we are back today with ten top tips for environmentally friendly travel. Most forms of travel over long distances (unless you are willing to put in a lot of physical effort) use fossil fuels and are generally not good for our planet. So today we will be giving you a few tips which although won't mean that your travel is 100% planet friendly, will be a good start to doing as much as you can.  Your Green World Blog TeamšŸ’š 1. Use trains and boats rather than planes where possible Planes are awful for the environment. They are, however, extremely practical and so easy to use, cheap...It's hard to avoid them! They are so quick too so you don't have to spend as much time travelling. However, they are really bad for the environment. For example, you could fly once to Edinburgh from Heathrow for the same carbon dioxide levels as driving to Edinburgh 336 times! 2. Fly...

10 Animals on the edge of extinction, You did not know about no.1 - Yangtze Finless Porpoise

The first animal of this series is the Yangtze finless porpoise, a dolphin living in fresh water in southern China in the Yangtze river. It is one of the very few dolphins living in fresh water and the only species left in the Yangtze river. Unfortunately, the porpoise is facing extinction. What is it? The Yangtze finless porpoise is a dolphin species living in the Yangtze River in southern China. It is one of the very few dolphin species that live in freshwater, and the only one that survived in the Yangtze river after the Baiji Dolphin was declared functionally extinct in 2006. It characteristically is about 2 meters long, has no fins -as the name suggests- and no beak. Its mouth however is curved upwards like a smile, giving the Porpoise and cute and friendly face. It feeds on small fish, crustaceans and molluscs. Sadly, the Yangtze finless Porpoise is considered "critically endangered" as there are only about 1000 of them left.  Why i...

Linking climate change and inequality - 'The Great Carbon Divide'

Hey everyone, Have you heard of 'The great carbon divide‘? It is often referred to as the 'carbon footprint gap' or the 'emissions imbalance‘, and produces frightening numbers. The great carbon divide describes the huge gap between the amount of carbon dioxide the rich versus the poor emit, and these numbers shocked even us.  What does this mean?  There have been many different studies, and all of them show terrifying results. One study from the Guardian and Oxfam, reports that the richest 1% of the world's population emit more carbon than the poorest 66%. The richest 1% consist of 77 million people, which may seem like a lot at first, but the poorest 66% refers to over 5 billion people! Africa, which is home to 17% of the world's population, only causes 4% of the world's emissions. This top 1% emitted 16% of global CO2 emissions in 2019, that's 5.9 billion tonnes of CO2. Modelling suggests that it would take someone who isn't in the top 1% about 150...

Why Didn't People Act Sooner On The Climate Crisis?

Hi Everyone! Welcome back to Green World, where today I wanted to talk about why people didn't act sooner about the climate crisis , when we have known about this issue for decades. I asked myself this too, and it wasn't until I read the chapter about it in Greta Thunberg's book that I started to understand the reasons behind why action was not taken sooner, and why this crisis has been allowed to escalate as far as it has. As someone who has only been on the planet for 14 years, a part of me does resent people around long before I was for not having acted on an issue that they knew would continue to affect people around the world. They knew it was not an issue that would go away, so why didn't they act, when it was easier to do so? Changing our now very ingrained habits is so difficult, whereas fifty years ago, ways of life could have been more easily influenced. Well, there are a few reasons why action was not taken to combat cl...

Amazon Rainforest series - part 2: eco system and food chains

Welcome back to our Amazon mini-series! Today, we're going to talk about the eco system and food chains of the Amazon Rainforest. The eco system is very complex. If you read our last Amazon post you will know the great number of species that call the Amazon Rainforest home. The Amazon Rainforest is a very accurate name for it. Massive amounts of rain fall on the forest every year. Most of that rain is blown in from the Atlantic Ocean. The rest comes from evaporation. The rainforest is known to be full of life. It provides one of the last refuges for jaguars , harpy eagles and pink river dolphins . But the rainforest is home to many more animals than that. Everyone has heard of poison dart frogs right? In fact, the Amazon Rainforest contains 1 in 10 of all known animal species on Earth! That's a lot of animals! The Amazon is home to over 1 000 species of birds, from hummingbirds to eagles. Macaws are probably the most well...

Beavers and their dams: what effects do they have?

Hi everyone, Today we're talking about beavers and their effects on the surrounding ecosystems and environments. 'Beaver' referres to two species in the genus Castor . They are found in North America, Europe and Asia and are the largest rodents in those places and the second largest rodents in the world. Beavers grow up to 80 cm long with a flat, paddle-shaped tail up to 45 cm. They have a small head, large incisor teeth and fur lined lips to avoid inhaling water while cutting and transporting branches underwater. They weigh 16-30kg and are nocturnal. Beavers live in streams, rivers, marshes, ponds and lakes where they construct dams. These have earned them the title 'ecosystem engineers' but we'll talk about that later. The dams are constructed with branches, sticks and rocks. They create a calm pool with a higher water level on one side. Beavers make their homes (lodges) in these calm pools. Beaver dams are both have bot...