Skip to main content

Energy comparison: solar (PV) panels

Hi everyone,

Today I'm looking into the first on a long list of energy sources: solar (PV) panels. Are they actually sustainable and could they become our main energy source in the near future? After all, enough energy from the sun reaches the earth in 90 minutes to cover the entire world's energy consumption for a whole year!

How they work

There are a couple of ways to transform energy from the sun into electricity. The one we are looking at today is solar panels also known as solar photovoltaic technology. Photovoltaic (PV) technology is the key to solar panels. A solar panel is made of many PV cells. A single PV cell will produce 1-2 watts of power. They are very thin and are normally protected by glass and/or plastics. This is the best explanation I could find (click here for the source):
When the semiconductor is exposed to light, it absorbs the light’s energy and transfers it to negatively charged particles in the material called electrons. This extra energy allows the electrons to flow through the material as an electrical current.
The electric current produced is a direct current, so a converter is added to convert it into an alternating current used in households. Some PV systems will have structures that angle the panels to face the sun for maximal energy production.

Energy storage

Solar panels themselves do not store energy. However, there are batteries for storing solar energy. They are quite expensive. Lithium-ion batteries are at least 90% efficient. That isn't terrible but you would still lose 10% of your electricity. Lead-acid batteries may be the most affordable, but they have an efficiency of 60%-80% (depending on model and brand). That's quite bad. Flow batteries, which are the newest model have 85% efficiency. So all in all, solar batteries aren't amazing and it's definitely one of the biggest problems for the industry.

Energy in production

To produce one 100-watt solar panel, you need about 200kWh (varying massively). With enough sunlight, the 100-watt solar panel would produce enough electricity to cover that in about 2 years. A solar array (multiple solar panels) has a carbon footprint about 20 times smaller than a power plant (when both produce the same amount of energy). A solar panel becomes net zero after about 4 years of being used. We're hoping that it will soon be possible to use solar panels to power the factory making solar panels. However, there would still be CO2 emissions due to transportation and maintenance.

Downsides

In 2016, 250 000 tonnes of 'solar panel waste' were generated in the whole world. Estimates say it could be 78 million tonnes in 2050. Cadmium and lead are contained in this waste and can be washed into local rivers and bodies of water, causing extreme health risks for nearby people.
As mentioned above, fossil fuels, normally coal, are needed to produce solar panels. During production, hydrofluoric acid and sodium hydroxide are used. Most of this is dumped in local bodies of water, where they release toxic substances and chemical waste. There are also allegations of a lack of the needed safety gear and regulations that protect the workers producing the solar panels.
19 different rare metals are needed for PV cells, and most of them require mining. So we cannot create endless solar panels without running out of materials.

Covering the Sahara?

Many people think we should cover the Sahara desert with solar panels. This may sound like a good idea at first. After all, it would produce enough electricity to easily power the whole world, there is plenty and as not many species live in the desert, it wouldn't destroy too much habitat. However, it is a very bad idea.
  1. We have already mentioned the fact that we do not have the needed resources to produce that many solar panels.
  2. We do not have the infrastructure to build a massive solar field.
  3. Such a project would produce massive greenhouse gas emissions during production.
  4. As already mentioned, we can't effienciety store solar energy and transporting it to another part of the world would be difficult.
  5. We would have to replace the solar panels after about 25 years, which would cause massive amounts of waste.
  6. It would cost trillions of dollars.
  7. While it is night in the Sahara, there will be no electricity production. However at this time, it is broad daylight in Australia meaning that they need electricity. As said before, the storage is not optimal.
  8. A power cable from the sahara to the rest of the world would have at least a 20% power loss.
  9. The solar panels would cool the desert, meaning plants would grow. Then it wouldn't be a desert anymore and we would be destroying more habitat.
  10. The dust and sand that the wind in the sahara picks up, fertilises the Amazon rainforest. With all those solar panels in the way, the dust wouldn't fertilise the Amazon. The amazon dying would be a catastrophy.
  11. Due to point 9. hurricanes and storms would rampage the Americas more frequently.
  12. Global oxygen levels may drop due to losing the amazon (point 10.) and the atlantic also being affected.
I could go on and on, but I think you get the point. Covering the entire Sahara and trying to power the whole world with it, is a really bad idea. However, it could be implemented on a much smaller scale to provide local populations with electricity. Morroco has the world's largest solar farm in the Sahara.



All in all, solar panels aren't great for the environment. However, the idea of using the sun's energy is actually not too bad. If the technology surrounding the production, waste and storage of solar panels could be drastically improved, then we could use solar panels as the world's main power source. We just need the technology to be efficient first. This is already in the making, hundreds of scientists world-wide are working on how to improve solar panels. There are also ideas of creating solar farms in space, which would eliminate the problem of solar farms being reliant on the weather.

Your Green World Blog Team💚


Sources:

Image: 
This image, owned by Wolfram Burner (on flickr.com) is liscensed under CC BY-NC 2.0.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Animals 46-50 in our '50 incredible animals' series

Hi everyone! Welcome to the final part in our '50 Incredible Animal series' where you can find out about animals 46-50. We started this series almost a year ago to celebrate our 50th post and it feels crazy to think that we are now nearing our 100th. To read all of the previous posts from this series, click here . Hope you enjoy it! 46. Spiny bush viper Spiny bush vipers, Atheris hispida, are a species of venomous snake native to Central and East Africa in tropical forests and shrubland. They are mostly solitary creatures but can climb trees, which is where they find the majority of their prey. Spiny bush vipers are carnivorous and feed on mammals, frogs and lizards, as well as birds. Independent from birth, Spiny bush vipers can have up to 12 'snakelets' at a time and are 15cm in length. Currently, there are no known threats to Spiny bush vipers, and they are categorized as Not Evaluated on the IUCN Red List. 47. Leafy sea dragon ...

Climate change: what is it and what's the problem

Hello, I've noticed that we are always mentioning climate change. Not only us blog editors but also politicians, activists and so on. The words climate change are bounced around in the media and probably in your households, but do you actually know what it is or how it works? I know that for a long time, I didn't know what it really meant. I hope that this post changes that. What is climate change and how does it work? The words climate change describe a slow shift in the earth's temperature and changes in the weather patterns. Having a single warm winter does not instantly mean climate change. Climate change happens over a long period of time. If you look at a temperature graph over the years, it doesn't go up in one day and then stay the same for another hundred years. It curves up slowly but steadily. This is a average temperature graph from 1880 to just after 2000. You can see how the temperature gradually gets warmer....

Heatwaves - what's so bad about them?

Hi everyone, Today we’re talking about heatwaves and what effects they have on us and the environment. Heatwaves are becoming ever more common, with 2023 breaking multiple world records. In China, 52.2°C were recorded at one point and the coastal waters near Florida, USA, were as warm as a hot tub. This is because of the combination of climate change and El Niño , both of which make the effects of the other worse. But we can’t push the blame onto El Niño. When analysed it became clear that without human made climate change the USA heat records would have been almost impossible. So what exactly are the effects of such high temperatures. A study in Europe found that the 2022 heatwave possibly caused over 70 000 heat related deaths. Although it is sometimes hard to tell whether or not someone died from the heat or from something else, after analysing the data the team found that their original estimate of 62 000 people (which is still a lot) was probably ...

Announcement: Factfile

This image is owned by a blog editor.

16.08.2020 Animal of the week: Elephant

Hello. On the 12th of August it was International Elephant Day, so we decided that this week's post should be about elephants. Elephants are the largest living land mammals. There are three types of elephant; the African bush elephant; the African forest elephant and the Asian elephant. African elephants have larger ears, whereas Asian elephants have smaller ears. Elephants use their trunks to breath, bring food and drink to their mouths and to grasp objects. Elephants' legs are like pillars. They carry the Elephant's massive weight. African bush elephants weigh 6000kg, Asian elephants weigh 4000kg and African forest elephants weigh 2700kg. Basically, they are very heavy.Elephants eat grasses, small plants, bushes, fruit, twigs, tree bark, and roots. Elephants can live up to 70 years old in the wild. They communicate by sight, touch and smell. Sadly, these wonderful mammals are in danger. African elephants are listed as vulne...

Linking climate change and inequality - 'The Great Carbon Divide'

Hey everyone, Have you heard of 'The great carbon divide‘? It is often referred to as the 'carbon footprint gap' or the 'emissions imbalance‘, and produces frightening numbers. The great carbon divide describes the huge gap between the amount of carbon dioxide the rich versus the poor emit, and these numbers shocked even us.  What does this mean?  There have been many different studies, and all of them show terrifying results. One study from the Guardian and Oxfam, reports that the richest 1% of the world's population emit more carbon than the poorest 66%. The richest 1% consist of 77 million people, which may seem like a lot at first, but the poorest 66% refers to over 5 billion people! Africa, which is home to 17% of the world's population, only causes 4% of the world's emissions. This top 1% emitted 16% of global CO2 emissions in 2019, that's 5.9 billion tonnes of CO2. Modelling suggests that it would take someone who isn't in the top 1% about 150...

An exciting initiative from Co-op and Sainsbury's...

Hi Everyone! Today I want to tell you about something I think is very exciting. If you want to recycle more plastic then this could be your chance! Co-op and Sainsbury's have both launched a new soft plastics recycling scheme where you bring your 'soft plastics' (things like crisp packets, chocolate wrappers and fruit and veg bags) into a designated area. For 'hard plastics' such as yoghurt pots, juice cartons and fruit and veg punnets, you can use either your local kerbside collection but not every area collects plastics in this way, including mine so we collect ours and bring it to the tip ourselves. To check if it's a soft plastic you can use the scrunch test- scrunch up the object and if it pings back then it is probably plastic. Then you need to clean it and bring it into one of the stores. Co-op even accepts plastics from other retailers! Co-op uses the plastic to make bin bags for use in the store which I think is a g...

Announcement: Animal of the week

How well do you know the Arctic and the Antarctic? - Quiz

Welcome back to Green World, As announced last week, we're starting our new monthly series: quizzes! This post contains the questions, you have to write down the answers and compare them with the solutions right at the bottom of this post.  Questions: True or False? The Arctic is not actually a land mass, it's a frozen ocean. How many people live in the Arctic circle? a) 500 000 b) 4 million c) 10 million True or False? Narwals don't actually have unicorn-like horns. That's just a legend. What percentage of the world's freshwater is frozen within the Arctic's ice? a) 10% b) 15% c) 20% True or False? The Arctic covers parts of 15 different countries. Scientists exploring Antarctica have measured winds of up to... a) 100 km/h b) 150km/h c) 200km/h True or False? The driest (natural) place on Earth is in Antarctica...

06.09.2020 Animal Of the Week: Seven-spotted Ladybird

Hello Everyone, Welcome to this week's animal of the week post. This time about the ladybird, and personally I can't wait to find out more about these creatures. Enjoy! Which ladybird we are investigating today? Today, I am telling you about the seven-spotted ladybird (Coccinella septempunctata), which is the most common ladybird in Europe. Other species include the Two Spot Ladybird and other uncommon ladybirds such as the 16 Spot and other peculiar types. Habitat The seven-spotted ladybird lives in a variety of habitats such as meadows, gardens and hedgerows. They can also be found on farmland, especially with crops such as alfalfa, clover and wheat and corn before it grows too tall. Diet The seven-spotted ladybird feeds on a range of aphid species. This is why they are often referred to as a gardener's best friend as they eat these creatures who can damage plants. They can also eat white flies and anything else that is soft-bo...